Data maintenance: the pros and cons of retaining data

data maintenance

You may not need to replace your NetApp file. Maybe you need to improve the use of that. Repel and rejuvenate it instead of supplanting it.

Unstructured information – though extraordinarily profitable – is largely bluffing. It tends to be extremely important for a short period of time and then its value drops sharply, but its quality does not drop to zero. In fact, there are several cases of use of verifiable unstructured information that builds its value well above zero. Anyway, despite all this does not justify the storage of level 1.

Consider only one case of using unstructured information. Consider a medical center that stores most of your patients’ data in an unstructured configuration. The records of specialist visits a week ago are unfathomably essential at this time, and could be imperative within a few years. In any case, your estimate will decrease in a few months, but the health care facility still has to keep records. Imagine a scenario in which, in any case, the health care facility can build the estimation of these records by searching for information or programming recognition of signs so that they can distinguish patterns in a large number of cases. accessible recordings. Imagine a scenario in which such a survey could help you better analyze patients or distinguish between large and terrible drug interactions. The imaginable results are unlimited, but at random they keep the information available at an appropriate cost.

In any case, the difficulties of maintaining enormous unstructured information measures are military. Most NAS frameworks are extensible and non-extensible, which means that you are definitely creating islands of information. It is difficult to review the information compared to information that is not monitored or found half-heartedly. It is also trying to get customers to use genuine information when it is distributed in many frames.

One answer to this problem is a scalable NAS system. While this will address the problem of focal administration, it is not at all imaginable to place chronic unstructured information in Tier 1 storage. This is largely due to the fact that the expenditure per gigabyte of such frames tends to be significantly more Expensive than the options.

It is more appropriate to put such information into article storage because it is monitored more midway, is very versatile and considerably less expensive than scalable NAS configurations. In any case, create another test. Regardless of the possibility that you have continued unraveling Filer and put all the rest in the article’s storage framework, you now have two islands of information. Clients must understand where they should go with the ultimate goal of discovering the information they are looking for. Another proof is that you may need to interconnect customers with the working capacity convention of the article storage framework. This multiple quality is precisely what the tracks are trying to do in the opposite direction.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *